"What
I am condemning is that one power, with a president who has no foresight,
who cannot think properly, is now wanting to plunge the world into
a holocaust."

Nelson Mandela Critical
of Bush
Ofeibea Quist-Arcton writing
from Johannesburg
Former South African president and Nobel
peace prize laureate, Nelson Mandela, has strongly criticised the
American leader, George W Bush, calling him arrogant and shortsighted.
Mandela also hinted that the US president was behaving like a racist
in his determination to go to war with Iraq.
Addressing an international
women’s forum in Johannesburg on Thursday, Mandela uttered
his most outspoken remarks about Bush to date, asking, "Why
is the United States behaving so arrogantly?"
South Africa’s revered
elder statesman added: "What I am condemning is that one power,
with a president who has no foresight, who cannot think properly,
is now wanting to plunge the world into a holocaust."
Mandela’s strong anti-Bush
language coincided with a letter sent to Washington and drafted
by eight European countries backing Bush’s stance on matters
concerning the Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.
Iraq is currently being inspected
for weapons of mass destruction by a team from the United Nations,
which issued a generally unfavourable interim report this week.
The weapons’ inspectors announced Monday that they required
more time to determine whether Iraq indeed possesses such weapons.
Commenting on Mandela's outburst,
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said: "The president (Bush)
expresses his gratitude to the many leaders of Europe who obviously
feel differently... He understands there are going to be people
who are more comfortable doing nothing about a growing menace that
could turn into a holocaust," said Fleischer.
However Mandela rebuked Iraq
for not cooperating fully with the weapons’ inspectors. He
announced that South Africa would support any measures taken against
Iraq by the UN.
Mandela implied in his remarks
about Bush, which were also critical of British prime minister Tony
Blair, that American policy on Iraq was motivated more by financial
than human rights’ concerns. "All that [the U.S.] wants
is Iraqi oil," Mandela said.
Blair, he added, was simply
"the foreign minister of the United States. He is no longer
prime minister of Britain."
President Bush insists the U.S.
would be justified in taking on President Saddam militarily, even
if the UN does not authorise an attack.
France and Germany are among
a number of countries publicly opposed to Bush’s policy on
Iraq. The American leader has indicated that he would like to set
a deadline for the Iraqis to demonstrate they have disarmed.
"Who are they to pretend
that they are the policemen of the world, the ones that should decide
for the people of Iraq what should be done with their government
and their leadership?" asked Mandela, accusing Bush of "trying
to bring about carnage".
Mandela took issue with both
Bush and Blair who he said were disregarding the authority of the
UN and undermining its African secretary-general, Kofi Annan, who
comes from Ghana. Mandela became personal in his accusations and
launched a verbal attack on the two men, asking: "Is it because
the secretary-general of the United Nations is now a black man?
They never did that when secretary-generals were white."
Africa’s best known statesman
said the UN was the chief reason why a third world war had been
avoided and urged that any decisions on Iraq should be dealt with
by the UN. Mandela has been consistently critical of Bush’s
handling of the Iraqi question over recent months, a view widely
mirrored in other parts of Africa among leaders, politicians and
ordinary people.
Mandela’s comments also
echo the official view from South Africa. His successor, President
Thabo Mbeki, said this week: "We do not believe there is anything
that has been said which says there is a need to go to war [with
Iraq]". Mbeki is scheduled to meet Blair this weekend, just
after the British prime minister has finished a summit with Bush
at Camp David on Friday.
Analysts in South Africa predict
that another conflict in the Gulf would mean a hike in domestic
oil prices and other economic consequences. Similar concern is being
expressed in the columns of newspapers in several African countries.
back to
home page
|