"A
recent poll tells us that one in two Americans now believe Saddam
was responsible for the attack on the World Trade Centre. But the
American public is not merely being misled. It is being browbeaten
and kept in a state of ignorance and fear. God appointed America
to save the world in any way that suits America. God appointed Israel
to be the nexus of America's Middle Eastern policy, and anyone who
wants to mess with that idea is a) anti-Semitic, b) anti-American,
c) with the enemy, and d) a terrorist."

THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA
HAS GONE MAD
by John Le
Carré
America has entered one of its periods
of historical madness, but this is the worst I can remember: worse
than McCarthyism, worse than the Bay of Pigs, and in the long term
potentially more disastrous than the Vietnam War.
The reaction to 9/11 is beyond anything
Osama bin Laden could have hoped for in his nastiest dreams. As
in McCarthy times, the freedoms that have made America the envy
of the world are being systematically eroded. The combination of
compliant US media and vested corporate interests is once more ensuring
that a debate that should be ringing out in every town square is
confined to the loftier columns of the East Coast press.
The imminent war was planned years before bin Laden struck, but
it was he who made it possible. Without bin Laden, the Bush junta
would still be trying to explain such tricky matters as how it came
to be elected in the first place; Enron; its shameless favouring
of the already-too-rich; its reckless disregard for the world's
poor, the ecology and a raft of unilaterally abrogated international
treaties. They might also have to be telling us why they support
Israel in its continuing disregard for UN resolutions.
But bin Laden conveniently swept all that under the carpet. The
Bushies are riding high. Now 88 per cent of Americans want the war,
we are told. The US defence budget has been raised by another $60
billion to around $360 billion. A splendid new generation of nuclear
weapons is in the pipeline, so we can all breathe easy.
Quite what war 88 per cent of Americans think they are supporting
is a lot less clear. A war for how long, please? At what cost in
American lives? At what cost to the American taxpayer's pocket?
At what cost (because most of those 88 per cent are thoroughly decent
and humane people) in Iraqi lives?
How Bush and his junta succeeded in deflecting America's anger from
bin Laden to Saddam Hussein is one of the great public relations
conjuring tricks of history. But they swung it. A recent poll tells
us that one in two Americans now believe Saddam was responsible
for the attack on the World Trade Centre. But the American public
is not merely being misled. It is being browbeaten and kept in a
state of ignorance and fear.
The carefully orchestrated neurosis should carry Bush and his fellow
conspirators nicely into the next election. Those who are not with
Mr Bush are against him. Worse, they are with the enemy. Which is
odd, because I'm dead against Bush, but I would love to see Saddam's
downfall -- just not on Bush's terms and not by his methods. And
not under the banner of such outrageous hypocrisy.
The religious cant that will send American
troops into battle is perhaps the most sickening aspect of this
surreal war-to-be. Bush has an arm-lock on God. And God has very
particular political opinions. God appointed America to save the
world in any way that suits America. God appointed Israel to be
the nexus of America's Middle Eastern policy, and anyone who wants
to mess with that idea is a) anti-Semitic, b) anti-American, c)
with the enemy, and d) a terrorist.
God also has pretty scary connections.
In America, where all men are equal in His sight, if not in one
another's, the Bush family numbers one President, one ex-President,
one ex-head of the CIA, the Governor of Florida and
the ex-Governor of Texas.
Care for a few pointers?
George W. Bush, 1978-84:
senior executive, Arbusto Energy/Bush Exploration, an oil company;
1986-90: senior executive of the Harken oil company.
Dick Cheney, 1995-2000: chief executive
of the Halliburton oil company.
Condoleezza Rice, 1991-2000: senior executive
with the Chevron oil company, which named an oil tanker after her.
And so on. But none of these trifling associations
affects the integrity of God's work.
In 1993, while ex-President George Bush
was visiting the ever-democratic Kingdom of Kuwait to receive thanks
for liberating them, somebody tried to kill
him. The CIA believes that "somebody" was Saddam. Hence
Bush Jr's cry: "That man tried
to kill my Daddy."
But it's still not personal, this war. It's still necessary. It's
still God's work. It's still about bringing freedom and democracy
to oppressed Iraqi people.
To be a member of the team you must also
believe in Absolute Good and Absolute Evil, and Bush, with a lot
of help from his friends, family and God, is there to tell us which
is which. What Bush won't tell us is the truth
about why we're going to war. What is at stake is not an "Axis
of Evil" but oil, money and
people's lives.
Saddam's misfortune is to sit on the
second biggest oilfield in the world. Bush wants it, and who helps
him get it will receive a piece of the cake. And who doesn't, won't.
If Saddam didn't have the oil, he could torture his citizens to
his heart's content. Other leaders do it every day -- think Saudi
Arabia, think Pakistan, think Turkey, think Syria, think Egypt.
Baghdad represents no clear and present
danger to its neighbours, and none to the US or Britain. Saddam's
weapons of mass destruction, if he's still got them, will be peanuts
by comparison with the stuff Israel or America could hurl at him
at five minutes notice. What is at stake is not an imminent military
or terrorist threat, but the economic imperative of US growth. What
is at stake is America's need to demonstrate its military power
to all of us -- to Europe and Russia and China, and poor mad little
North Korea, as well as the Middle
East; to show who rules America at
home, and who is to be ruled by
America abroad.
The most charitable interpretation of
Tony Blair's part in all this is that he believed that, by riding
the tiger, he could steer it. He can't. Instead, he gave it a phoney
legitimacy, and a smooth voice. Now, I fear, the same tiger has
him penned into a corner, and he can't get out.
It is utterly laughable that, at a time when Blair has talked himself
against the ropes, neither of Britain's opposition leaders can lay
a glove on him. But that's Britain's tragedy, as it is America's:
as our Governments spin, lie and lose their credibility, the electorate
simply shrugs and looks the other way.
Blair's best chance of personal survival must be that, at the eleventh
hour, world protest and an improbably emboldened UN will force Bush
to put his gun back in his holster unfired. But what happens when
the world's greatest cowboy rides back into town without a tyrant's
head to wave at the boys?
Blair's worst chance is that, with or
without the UN, he will drag us into a war that, if the will to
negotiate energetically had ever been there, could have been avoided;
a war that has been no more democratically debated in Britain than
it has in America or at the UN.
By doing so, Blair will have set back our relations with Europe
and the Middle East for decades to come. He will have helped to
provoke unforeseeable retaliation, great domestic unrest, and regional
chaos in the Middle East.
Welcome to the party of the ethical
foreign policy.
There is a middle way,
but it's a tough one: Bush dives in without UN approval and Blair
stays on the bank. Goodbye to the special relationship.
I cringe when I hear my Prime Minister
lend his head prefect's sophistries to this colonialist adventure.
His very real anxieties about terror are shared by all sane men.
What he can't explain is how he reconciles a global assault
on al-Qaeda with a territorial assault on Iraq.
We are in this war, if it takes place,
to secure the fig leaf of our special relationship, to grab our
share of the oil pot, and because, after all the public hand-holding
in Washington and Camp David, Blair has to show up at the
altar.
"But will we win, Daddy?"
"Of course, child. It will all
be over while you're still in bed."
"Why?"
"Because otherwise Mr Bush's
voters will get terribly impatient and may decide not to vote for
him."
"But will people be killed,
Daddy?"
"Nobody you know, darling. Just
foreign people."
"Can I watch it on television?"
"Only if Mr Bush says you can."
"And afterwards, will everything be normal again? Nobody will
do anything horrid any more?"
"Hush child, and go to sleep."
Last Friday a friend of mine in California
drove to his local supermarket with a sticker on his car saying:
"Peace is also Patriotic". It was gone by the time he'd
finished shopping.
- John Le Carré
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
English writer known for disillusioned, suspenseful spy novels based
on a wide knowledge of international espionage. Le Carré's
famous hero is George Smiley, a Chekhovian character and shadowlike
member of the British foreign service. In his works the author has
explored the moral problems of patriotism, espionage, and ends versus
means. Le Carré's style is precise and elegant, and his novels
are noted for skillful plotting and witty dialogue. Familiarity
with intelligence agents connects le Carré to the long tradition
of spy/writers from Christopher Marlowe, Ben Johnson and Daniel
Defoe to the modern day writers, such as Graham Greene, John Dickson
Carr, Somerset Maugham, Alec Waugh, and Ted Allbeury.
John Le Carré is the pen name of David Cornwall. He was born
in Poole, Dorset, as the son of Ronnie Cornwell, who engaged in
several million pound swindles and was imprisoned for fraud. According
to the author, this has been one of the factors for his fascination
with secrets. It has also inspired his novel THE HONOURABLE SCHOOLBOY
(1977). Le Carré has also told in an interview that he didn't
know his mother till he was 21.
Dissatisfied with Sherbone School, le Carré
persuaded his father to send him to school in Switzerland. He studied
at Berne University (1948-49) and after the military service, which
he did in Austria, le Carré returned in England. Le Carré
studied modern languages at Lincoln College, Oxford, graduating
in 1956. He was two years as a tutor at Eton, teaching French and
German, and then joined the Foreign Service.
In 1959 le Carré became
a member of the British foreign service in West Germany. Later he
was a consul in Hamburg. During his years at the operational section
of MI5 le Carré met John Bingham, who encouraged him to write
and read the manuscript of his first novel. Bingham, the pen-name
and family name of Lord Clanmorris, was one of the two men who inspired
le Carré's famous character, George Smiley: "Short,
fat and of a quiet disposition, he appeared to spend a lot of money
on really bad clothes..." Bingham, who had published crime
novels, never accepted the picture of Intelligence Services le Carré
gave in his books. "As far as John was concerned - and many
others too - claims of good intent were guff. I was a shit, consigned
to the ranks of others shits like Compton McKenzie, Malcolm Muggeridge
and J.C. Masterman, all of whom had betrayed the Service by writing
about it."
(Le Carré in his introduction to Bingham's Five Rounabouts
to Heaven, Pan Classic Crime, 2001)
Le Carré denied decades that his work in
Germany had an espionage character, but he has gradually broken
his silence and talked about this side of his life among others
in the BBC document The Secret Service (prod. 2000). At Lincoln
College he apparently kept his eyes open for possible agents recruited
by the Soviet Union. Later le Carré moved from MI5 to MI6,
and he was in Berlin when the wall was erected. His own experiences
inspired him to write a large novel which became CALL FOR THE DEAD
(1961), his first spy thriller. The book introduced George Smiley,
but was followed by a completely different kind of work, A MURDER
OF QUALITY (1962), a detective novel set in a boys' school.
After the success of his third novel, THE SPY WHO
CAME IN FROM THE COLD (1963), le Carré began to devote himself
full-time writing. His aim was to portrait the intelligence world
from a new view - "When I first began writing, Ian Fleming
was riding high and the picture of the spy was that of a character
who could have affairs with women, drive a fast car, who used gadgetry
and gimmickry to escape." With his breakthrough novel le Carré
established an alternative form to the James Bond cult and a new
type of hero. Graham Greene considered it the best spy story he
has ever read and J.B. Priestley wrote that the book was "superbly
constructed with an atmosphere of chilly hell." The novel won
le Carré the Somerset Maugham Award.
George Smiley's character is
based on more or lesson two true life persons: Lord Clanmorris,
who wrote novels under the name John Bingham and who worked for
MI5, and Vivian Green, who was Le Carre's teacher at Oxford.
Books by John le Carré
Call for
the Dead (1961)
A Murder of Quality (1962).
The Spy who Came in from the Cold (1963)
The Looking-Glass War (1965)
A Small Town in Germany (1968)
The Naive and Sentimental Lover (1971)
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, London (1974)
The Honourable Schoolboy, London (1977)
Smiley's People, London (1980)
The Little Drummmer Girl (1983)
A Perfect Spy, London (1986)
The Russia House (1989)
The Secret Pilgrim (1991)
The Night Manager (1993)
Our Game (1995)
The Tailor of Panama (1996)
Single & Single, London (1999)
back to
home page
|